 |
Web Hosting by Netfirms | Free Domain Names by Netfirms |
|
|
|
Quick Links to Sub-Sections | |
Then I encountered the order axioms. The order axioms allow us to compare quantities, one quantity being either greater than or less than another. I'd like to strangle the inventor of this concept. It has caused a lot of alienation in the world. When we compare ourselves among each other, we create distance among us. No one is less than or greater than anyone. The concept of equality holds true for all human beings. We are all persons with dignity and therefore are all equal. I must admit that some are less skilled while others are more skilled. But a skill is something that can be learned. We all have the potential to be Einsteins or Michaelangelos. All we need to do is unlock our limitless potentials. And believe me, using < or > to compare persons will get us nowhere. It will only stimulate competition, which life is not.
The concept of inequality serves some purpose though. An example is when we measure ourselves up to valid standards or goals. Suppose I own a candle factory and my goal is to produce 300 candles after three days. Three days pass and I have only produced 200 candles. I'd tell myself, "I made less than what I intend to produce." Then I'd evaluate my candle-making strategy and do some fine-tuning so that when the next order comes, I'll be able to give the exact number of candles or more. In this case, the concept of inequality is useful.
In the analysis of distribution of resources, the concept of inequality reveals a stunning fact. In algebra, when we add the same number to both sides of the inequality, the order of inequality remains unchanged. So it is with the so-called equal distribution of resources. Let's say Abe's total wealth is P400. Elmer's total wealth is P200. Abe is wealthier than Elmer, obviously. If Tatay gave each of us equal sums of money, we would still be unequal. Abe would still be rich; Elmer would still be poor. But with the so-called differential distribution, resources are so allocated so that the poor will receive the resources that will raise them to equality with the rich. Abe should receive P100 and Elmer should receive P300. Only then could we both be equal. Apply it to domestic and global economics--you get the picture. The point is, let us create a world where "no one is so poor as to have nothing to give and where no one is so rich as to have nothing to receive."